Skip to main content



Rating: 3.7/5
Review: "Transcendence movie review"

The fact that this is directed by Wally Pfister, the cinematographer for most of Christopher Nolan, raises the bar high. What else could go wrong with the thought-provoking idea of technology? The low rating on Rotten Tomatoes and IMDB proves that people expect more than just an entertaining two hour sci-fi flick.

The story: Johnny Depp plays Dr Will Caster who is interested in using technology to change the world. Later in the movie, he is shot and although he barely survives, he will die soon. His wife played by Rebecca Hall cannot accept the fact he is dying. She tries all means to upload his consciousness into a computer (a project which they are currently working). The story is intriguing as it uses technology (a little over the top) and merges it into the society. The thing is that the whole idea then becomes a somewhat generic movie. You can't help but think that some scenes have been done before. The pacing is alright and moves things briskly. The third act is familiar with bits of action injected to make the climax more exciting. Acting wise is alright. No one particularly stands out. Johnny Depp, who is mostly featured in a screen, has not much to play. Rebecca is alright. The other well-known cast (Morgan Freeman, Cillian Murphy, Paul Bettany, Kate Mara) are mostly wasted as they only appear here and there. There is no real reason as to why they should be in the movie other than being all-star movie. Cinematography is decent. But the slo-mo is pointless. Music wise is okay.

Overall: As a debut movie by Wally Pfister, it is okay. The idea is great but execution could been better. I think it would be better received if people didn't have high expectations on Wally's debut movie. It is obvious that this tries to sell with its all-star cast but unfortunately audiences disagree. This movie at most is entertaining but it does not make you think after you leave the cinema.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rating: 3.4/5 Review: "The Spirit of Ramayana" (103 minutes) "A passable Thai horror movie with an interesting concept but weak execution." As a low-budget horror movie, it has enough entertainment values. In the recent years, there are a few strong Thai horror movies with decent production values and there are many mediocre low-budget horror movies. The Spirit of Ramayana is somewhat in the middle. It may not look that polished but its themes and concept are intriguing enough. The story: The narrative is straight forward however its editing made the movie look messy and disjointed. It is a simple story about Mintra, a young dancer who is rejected for the main role because she cannot pull off an evil and sensual side. However, a spirit helps her to unleash her dark side. On paper, it sounds like a supernatural Black Swan. It lacks the emotional depth of Black Swan as the director seems only interested in churning out cheap scares. As the plot develops fur...
Best and Worst movies of 2011 2011 is over! It sees many good movies so it was kind of tricky to list the best 4 movies of 2011. It had been a good year for movies. Let's see if 2012 is any better. 1.Transformers: Dark of the Moon Rating: 4.5/5 It is one of the best 3D movie ever. It has cool action, great 3D and robots. It may be the final Transformers for Michael Bay. Only thing that can be improved is that rushed out ending. Other than that, it could be 2011 best action movie. 2.Sucker Punch Rating: 4.5/5 It is sad to see the critics slamming this movie. I find its presentation kind of cool and unique. The action is not bad too. Zack Synder really has a sense of cool visual which the movie a more interesting view. 3.Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Rating: 4.5/5 The end is finally here. Although it is the most action-packed movie in the franchise, I can't help but feel a little disappointed with the climax. I wanted a longer and more epic battle between Harry and Voldemo...
Rating: 3.9/5 Review: "Iron Man 2 DVD review" Well, for me, it is kind of disappointing. Seeing the lack of action and three short action scenes disappoints me as this movie has been reported to have a higher budget than the first one. Another thing disappointing is the pace. The pace in the first Iron Man movie is intense, it is filled with intense moments and quirky humour. This one's pace is slower with all the melodrama of Tony trying to live his "broken" life as he thinks he will soon die. And he starts being an ass, some drunk ass, and blah blah.... The story: The first third of the movie is not bad, still holding up some interesting moments like the villian, Ivan in a car race scene. The second third is where the story slows down, luckily it is bearable, when Tony behaves like an ass, drinking and dancing like some nut monkey. Then there is an action scene with Tony and his best friend in armour. The last third is the climax between Tony and Ivan which is...