Skip to main content


Rating: 4.2/5
Review: "Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice 3D IMAX movie review"

"Batman V Superman may have a disjointed plot but is saved from its stunning action scenes, visual effects and brief but decent emotional development of Batman and Superman."

Batman V Superman has to be one of the most anticipated film of the year. Who doesn't want to see two iconic superheroes clash head to head? Unfortunately when the review embargo was lifted, critics were not amused; it scores a low 30% on rotten tomatoes. The thing is that director Zack Snyder is never viewed positively by most critics. So is the sequel to Man of Steel really as bad as what the critics say? I would say not.

The story: First of all, Zack has a penchant for attractive visuals and action scenes. And it shows in this. Most of the action scenes happens in the third act. So what happen in the first and second acts? Critics have complained of its disjointed plot. I would agree to some extent that it is trying too hard to set up the Justice League and at the same time, developing on Batman's and Superman's emotions. The pacing is not as smooth as it should be. Sometimes the editing made the film more like an episodic event after another instead of a full feature film. Although the emotional sides of Bruce Wayne and Clark Kent could be developed more, the film does better in that area than the story. The visual effects and action kick in full gear in the last hour with a satisfying full-blown climax. Hans Zimmer and Junkie XL created a great score; epic and emotional. Acting wise is alright. Ben Affleck is a decent Bruce Wayne. Gal Gadot, as Wonder Woman, has little screen time but she has a strong presence in the film. Jesse Eisenberg is alright as a fast-talking Lex Luthor. He is just channeling his Mark Zuckerberg's performance here. The rest is almost the same as seen in Man of Steel.

3D IMAX: Zack's stunning vision alone just has to be seen on big screen. It is very detailed and sharp. The whole 3D experience adds to the 'WOW!' factor. Though the 3D effects do not have many gimmick moments, it helps in immersing me into the grim worlds of Gotham and Metropolis. The characters look three dimensional. Having seen in both normal cinema and IMAX, I say IMAX is the better choice if you feel like spurging on a ticket. IMAX is not exactly cheap but it is worth the money.

Overall: I can understand most of the negativity about the plot and 'the try-too-hard direction'. But Zack Snyder should be applauded for his tireless effort in creating attractive visuals and action. His action is fast and furious and he staged one of the best superhero battle scene in a superhero film; a fight with Doomsday. I enjoyed his visual style and it seems that critics are not even enjoying that department. Batman V Superman is a film made for general audience and fans, not for critics. I just hope Zack will find a better way to improve in his direction for Justice League.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rating: 3.4/5 Review: "The Spirit of Ramayana" (103 minutes) "A passable Thai horror movie with an interesting concept but weak execution." As a low-budget horror movie, it has enough entertainment values. In the recent years, there are a few strong Thai horror movies with decent production values and there are many mediocre low-budget horror movies. The Spirit of Ramayana is somewhat in the middle. It may not look that polished but its themes and concept are intriguing enough. The story: The narrative is straight forward however its editing made the movie look messy and disjointed. It is a simple story about Mintra, a young dancer who is rejected for the main role because she cannot pull off an evil and sensual side. However, a spirit helps her to unleash her dark side. On paper, it sounds like a supernatural Black Swan. It lacks the emotional depth of Black Swan as the director seems only interested in churning out cheap scares. As the plot develops fur...
Rating: 3.7/5 Review: "Terminator Salvation DVD review" -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is not bad. It is not the worst terminator movie, I actually thought Terminator 1 is just okay. Terminator 2 and 3 are quite entertaining followed by also entertaining Salvation. MCG, the director of Charlies' Angels, takes the directing seat and turned terminator into a dark and gritty world. As what he said, he did not want the future to be a shiny world but a dark and gritty world. He is considered to have done a great job in that and creating the realistic and cool action. But his story pretty much stays the same as his other movies, a simple mindless thrill ride. The story: The future is here and the year is 2018...John Conner is a daring man who will be willing to save people from Skynet, a evil organisation which creates Terminators. A mysterious man who is supposed to be dead suddenly finds himself in the year of...
Rating: 3.7/5 Review: "Fantastic Four movie review" "A decent gritty reboot that could have been something more than what it is now." This is Josh Trank's first big budget movie and it seems he is slightly inexperienced of directing a movie of a massive scale. Fresh from directing a small budget movie, Chronicle, it seems that he is overwhelmed by whatever happened (there are rumours that Matthew Vaughn was brought in to reshoot). Nonetheless, on the whole, the reboot is an alright movie that rehashes on the tired superhero origin. It is disappointing that it is a little shallow. I think with a longer runtime, it could benefit the characters' development and flow of the story. The story: Apparently, the writers of the film said that it does not follow any story from the source material. Instead, a new origin is created. I didn't exactly know how the original source material goes (I read a couple of Fantastic Four comic books to know the tone ...