Skip to main content

Rating: 4.2/5
Review: "Suicide Squad film review"

"A decent entry to the DC Extended Universe. It may be chaotic but David directs a decently paced blockbuster packed with enough thrilling action, pretty CGI and an interesting yet questionable sense of morality and justice."

This film has confirmed that critics detest DC Comic films. It even manages to score a lower percentage than the poorly received Batman V Superman. Critics blasted it for its shallow and tonally jarring plot, poor character's development and overdose of wacky visuals and kinetic action. I was a little surprised with its criticism and went in the cinema with an open mind. After it ended, I walked out and thought the critics are too harsh. Sure, it is not faultless but it is damn entertaining film.

The story: Since the film has to deal many characters, it starts with introducing the main characters to the audience. It is a smart move as we get to know more about Deadshot, Harley Quinn and some other characters' background. We learn that they are not nice characters but they do have weaknesses. The actors and actresses did a decent job in bringing the inner demons and emotions of the characters. Will Smith plays Will Smith. Margot Robbie plays a sexy yet somehow annoying Harley who loves Joker blindly. Jared Leto plays a menacing Joker. His acting is mostly good but a few times, it seems not very consistent. Perhaps that is the nature of his character. The rest is decent. The plot is actually fairly simple with a one-day mission for the team. It does not try to pack in many subplots like how Batman V Superman does. Director David Ayer may not be very sure on how to utilize the characters fully but he directs the action confidently and sets a decent pace. At times it may get a bit chaotic with rapid fast editing and loud pop songs, but it is still an entertaining two hours. With its many characters fighting for screen time, it needs a director's cut but David is firmed that the theatrical version is his cut. The dream is thrown out of the window. Music by Steven Price is good although sometimes the funky pop songs overshadow it.

Overall: It is a decent blockbuster to wrap up the blockbuster season. With a hefty budget of US$175 million, it is packed with enough thrilling action and expensive looking CGI and a few notable stars. Critics may not enjoy but I suspect the general audience and fans will enjoy it more. It is clear that this is connected to the world of Batman and Superman by adding cameos and references to the previous and future DC Comic films. The villains and the grey line of morality and justice are a fresh take to the already tired superhero genre.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rating: 3.4/5 Review: "The Spirit of Ramayana" (103 minutes) "A passable Thai horror movie with an interesting concept but weak execution." As a low-budget horror movie, it has enough entertainment values. In the recent years, there are a few strong Thai horror movies with decent production values and there are many mediocre low-budget horror movies. The Spirit of Ramayana is somewhat in the middle. It may not look that polished but its themes and concept are intriguing enough. The story: The narrative is straight forward however its editing made the movie look messy and disjointed. It is a simple story about Mintra, a young dancer who is rejected for the main role because she cannot pull off an evil and sensual side. However, a spirit helps her to unleash her dark side. On paper, it sounds like a supernatural Black Swan. It lacks the emotional depth of Black Swan as the director seems only interested in churning out cheap scares. As the plot develops fur...
Rating: 3.7/5 Review: "Terminator Salvation DVD review" -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is not bad. It is not the worst terminator movie, I actually thought Terminator 1 is just okay. Terminator 2 and 3 are quite entertaining followed by also entertaining Salvation. MCG, the director of Charlies' Angels, takes the directing seat and turned terminator into a dark and gritty world. As what he said, he did not want the future to be a shiny world but a dark and gritty world. He is considered to have done a great job in that and creating the realistic and cool action. But his story pretty much stays the same as his other movies, a simple mindless thrill ride. The story: The future is here and the year is 2018...John Conner is a daring man who will be willing to save people from Skynet, a evil organisation which creates Terminators. A mysterious man who is supposed to be dead suddenly finds himself in the year of...
Rating: 3.7/5 Review: "Fantastic Four movie review" "A decent gritty reboot that could have been something more than what it is now." This is Josh Trank's first big budget movie and it seems he is slightly inexperienced of directing a movie of a massive scale. Fresh from directing a small budget movie, Chronicle, it seems that he is overwhelmed by whatever happened (there are rumours that Matthew Vaughn was brought in to reshoot). Nonetheless, on the whole, the reboot is an alright movie that rehashes on the tired superhero origin. It is disappointing that it is a little shallow. I think with a longer runtime, it could benefit the characters' development and flow of the story. The story: Apparently, the writers of the film said that it does not follow any story from the source material. Instead, a new origin is created. I didn't exactly know how the original source material goes (I read a couple of Fantastic Four comic books to know the tone ...