Skip to main content
Rating: 3.8/5

Review: "Final Destination 5 3D movie review"

It is obvious that this is the fifth installment to the popular franchise but it seems the latest movie is getting tiresome. It didn't do exactly well in Box Office; its earnings is the last of the franchise but it may do better worldwide. Final Destination 5 can be considered the best installment though I have not watched 1 and 2. But it is a lot better than 3 and 4 in terms of suspense. It is almost as gory as them so there's no problem. The 4th one is not bad, there is a hot girl and some intense moments but that's about it. The 5th has a hot girl, more intense and suspenseful moments including near-death moments and heck, Brian Tyler scores some intense music especially in the opening credits.

The story: It is pretty routine for this series. The main character sees a premotion and warns everyone who dies. They escape but death comes after them. They die in horrible deaths. End. Nothing much. The Final Destination fanchise is only about how they die. Some deaths in this are suspenseful. Noteable ones are the first death (not the premotion one) and the intense climax. Others are okay, they die normally with not much suspense. Some of the deaths do play tricks on you until the causes of the deaths are revealed.

3D is not bad. It does not really bring anything new to the table. Nowadays, those movies filmed in 3D have the depth between the characters and backgrounds and show stuff in your face. Final Destination 5 is just about that. It actually has a few gimmick shots like blood splatters onto the screen when a character's head is smashed. With a few more, that's about it for gimmick shots. You can clearly see that is not what the director wants to achieve. He wants to show the manic deaths and squabbles in front of your face and it does work. At times, it does feel like you are just standing there witnessing the horrible deaths. So is it a great 3D movie? I would say no but it is close to being one.

Overall: Is it worth the watch in 3D? For me, I would say it is alright. I felt the movie is a little too short for a 3D movie. Running at 1 hour 32 minutes minus the credits, it felt short. And by the time the last death happens, I was surprised that it ended quite fast. Perhaps it is due to the brisk pace. It shows I enjoyed it. I am not sure if there will be a 6th movie due to the disappointing Box Office but if there is, I will be supporting it.

PS. It says that it is edited for a M-18 rating but I could not see any scene being disjointed. Not like the Conan remake where they obviously cut the sex scene.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rating: 3.4/5 Review: "The Spirit of Ramayana" (103 minutes) "A passable Thai horror movie with an interesting concept but weak execution." As a low-budget horror movie, it has enough entertainment values. In the recent years, there are a few strong Thai horror movies with decent production values and there are many mediocre low-budget horror movies. The Spirit of Ramayana is somewhat in the middle. It may not look that polished but its themes and concept are intriguing enough. The story: The narrative is straight forward however its editing made the movie look messy and disjointed. It is a simple story about Mintra, a young dancer who is rejected for the main role because she cannot pull off an evil and sensual side. However, a spirit helps her to unleash her dark side. On paper, it sounds like a supernatural Black Swan. It lacks the emotional depth of Black Swan as the director seems only interested in churning out cheap scares. As the plot develops fur...
Rating: 3.7/5 Review: "Terminator Salvation DVD review" -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This is not bad. It is not the worst terminator movie, I actually thought Terminator 1 is just okay. Terminator 2 and 3 are quite entertaining followed by also entertaining Salvation. MCG, the director of Charlies' Angels, takes the directing seat and turned terminator into a dark and gritty world. As what he said, he did not want the future to be a shiny world but a dark and gritty world. He is considered to have done a great job in that and creating the realistic and cool action. But his story pretty much stays the same as his other movies, a simple mindless thrill ride. The story: The future is here and the year is 2018...John Conner is a daring man who will be willing to save people from Skynet, a evil organisation which creates Terminators. A mysterious man who is supposed to be dead suddenly finds himself in the year of...
Rating: 3.7/5 Review: "Fantastic Four movie review" "A decent gritty reboot that could have been something more than what it is now." This is Josh Trank's first big budget movie and it seems he is slightly inexperienced of directing a movie of a massive scale. Fresh from directing a small budget movie, Chronicle, it seems that he is overwhelmed by whatever happened (there are rumours that Matthew Vaughn was brought in to reshoot). Nonetheless, on the whole, the reboot is an alright movie that rehashes on the tired superhero origin. It is disappointing that it is a little shallow. I think with a longer runtime, it could benefit the characters' development and flow of the story. The story: Apparently, the writers of the film said that it does not follow any story from the source material. Instead, a new origin is created. I didn't exactly know how the original source material goes (I read a couple of Fantastic Four comic books to know the tone ...